<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Hate on Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whatknows.com/blog/2008/05/12/dont-hate-on-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whatknows.com/blog/2008/05/12/dont-hate-on-twitter/</link>
	<description>jed brubaker&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:04:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jed</title>
		<link>http://www.whatknows.com/blog/2008/05/12/dont-hate-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-7875</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 06:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatknows.com/blog/?p=135#comment-7875</guid>
		<description>Boo - I totally respect your opinion (adore might be the better word), and honestly I read your post and it just pushed me towards that twitter post that was destined.

That said, &quot;utility&quot; for me really comes from that tracking content via IM. When I talked about how Twitter would IM when someone wrote about some topic... well, that frequently means I know about things far earlier than many. I wrote about the forthcoming LOLcat book before it was even searchable on Amazon... I owe that to some random tweet. (okay! my secret is out... le sigh).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boo &#8211; I totally respect your opinion (adore might be the better word), and honestly I read your post and it just pushed me towards that twitter post that was destined.</p>
<p>That said, &#8220;utility&#8221; for me really comes from that tracking content via IM. When I talked about how Twitter would IM when someone wrote about some topic&#8230; well, that frequently means I know about things far earlier than many. I wrote about the forthcoming LOLcat book before it was even searchable on Amazon&#8230; I owe that to some random tweet. (okay! my secret is out&#8230; le sigh).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Requisite &#8220;I&#8217;m addicted to Twitter&#8221; Post &#171; The Machine is Us</title>
		<link>http://www.whatknows.com/blog/2008/05/12/dont-hate-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-7874</link>
		<dc:creator>Requisite &#8220;I&#8217;m addicted to Twitter&#8221; Post &#171; The Machine is Us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatknows.com/blog/?p=135#comment-7874</guid>
		<description>[...] has put some real thinking into what Twitter does. He also has some great advice: People complain that Twitter is just “one [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has put some real thinking into what Twitter does. He also has some great advice: People complain that Twitter is just “one [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boo</title>
		<link>http://www.whatknows.com/blog/2008/05/12/dont-hate-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-7873</link>
		<dc:creator>boo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 21:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatknows.com/blog/?p=135#comment-7873</guid>
		<description>I hope I was able to convey that I&#039;m not actually anti-Twitter, &quot;hating on&quot; Twitter, or  convinced that 2 out of 3 dentists say Twitter causes cavities.

I was just trying to describe how I haven&#039;t found it very personally useful, but how I can see how one could love it. Also, I admit to being generally stubborn about adopting fads (especially of the technological variety), but in this case, I tried it out for a few months, and decided I&#039;d rather stick to my highly uninteroperable communication methods. That being said, Jed, if anyone could make me a believer, it&#039;s you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope I was able to convey that I&#8217;m not actually anti-Twitter, &#8220;hating on&#8221; Twitter, or  convinced that 2 out of 3 dentists say Twitter causes cavities.</p>
<p>I was just trying to describe how I haven&#8217;t found it very personally useful, but how I can see how one could love it. Also, I admit to being generally stubborn about adopting fads (especially of the technological variety), but in this case, I tried it out for a few months, and decided I&#8217;d rather stick to my highly uninteroperable communication methods. That being said, Jed, if anyone could make me a believer, it&#8217;s you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
